Cloud-processed 4D CMR flow imaging for pulmonary flow quantification
Creators
- Chelu, Raluca G.1, 2
- Wanambiro, Kevin W.3, 2
- Hsiao, Albert4
- Swart, Laurens E.1, 2
- Voogd, Teun2
- Hoven, Allard T. van den1
- Kranenburg, Matthijs van1
- Coenen, Adriaan1, 2
- Boccalini, Sara5, 2
- Wielopolski, Piotr A.2
- Vogel, Mika W.6
- Krestin, Gabriel P.2
- Vasanawala, Shreyas S.7
- Budde, Ricardo P.J.1, 2
- Roos-Hesselink, Jolien W.1
- Nieman, Koen1, 2
- 1. Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam (Netherlands)
- 2. Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam (Netherlands)
- 3. Department of Radiology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi (Kenya)
- 4. Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, CA (United States)
- 5. Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Genoa (Italy)
- 6. MR Applications and Workflow – Europe, GE Healthcare B.V. Hoevelaken (Netherlands)
- 7. Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA (United States)
Description
Highlights: • With 4D flow, any plane of interest can be interactively chosen for quantitative measurements. • Anatomical and flow data are obtained during an approximately 10-min free-breathing scan. • 4D CMR flow measurements correlated well with the 2D PC ones. • Eddy current correction is important for good results with 4D flow. - Abstract: Objectives: In this study, we evaluated a cloud-based platform for cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) four-dimensional (4D) flow imaging, with fully integrated correction for eddy currents, Maxwell phase effects, and gradient field non-linearity, to quantify forward flow, regurgitation, and peak systolic velocity over the pulmonary artery. Methods: We prospectively recruited 52 adult patients during one-year period from July 2014. The 4D flow and planar (2D) phase-contrast (PC) were acquired during same scanning session, but 4D flow was scanned after injection of a gadolinium-based contrast agent. Eddy-currents were semi-automatically corrected using the web-based software. Flow over pulmonary valve was measured and the 4D flow values were compared against the 2D PC ones. Results: The mean forward flow was 92 (±30) ml/cycle measured with 4D flow and 86 (±29) ml/cycle measured with 2D PC, with a correlation of 0.82 and a mean difference of −6 ml/cycle (−41–29). For the regurgitant fraction the correlation was 0.85 with a mean difference of −0.95% (−17–15). Mean peak systolic velocity measured with 4D flow was 92 (±49) cm/s and 108 (±56) cm/s with 2D PC, having a correlation of 0.93 and a mean difference of 16 cm/s (−24–55). Conclusion: 4D flow imaging post-processed with an integrated cloud-based application accurately quantifies pulmonary flow. However, it may underestimate the peak systolic velocity.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.07.018Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.07.018;
- PII
- S0720-048X(16)30235-2;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- European Journal of Radiology
- Journal Volume
- 85
- Journal Issue
- 10
- Journal Page Range
- p. 1849-1856
- ISSN
- 0720-048X
- CODEN
- EJRADR
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Netherlands
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 49006134
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORRECTIONS; CORRELATIONS; EDDY CURRENTS; IMAGES; NMR IMAGING; PEAKS
- Descriptors DEC
- CURRENTS; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; ELECTRIC CURRENTS; MEDICINE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; RADIOLOGY
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2016 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.