Published March 2013 | Version v1
Journal article

Defending majority voting systems against a strategic attacker

  • 1. The Israel Electric Corporation, PO Box 10, Haifa 31000 (Israel)
  • 2. Collaborative Autonomic Computing Laboratory, School of Computer Science, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (China)
  • 3. Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stavanger, 4036 Stavanger (Norway)

Description

Voting systems used in technical and tactical decision making in pattern recognition and target detection, data handling, signal processing, distributed and secure computing etc. are considered. A maxmin two period game is analyzed where the defender first protects and chooses units for participation in voting. The attacker thereafter attacks a subset of units. It is shown that when the defender protects all the voting units, the optimal number of units chosen for voting is either one or the maximal possible odd number. When the defender protects only the units chosen for voting, the optimal number of chosen units increases with the defender resource superiority (i.e., more resources than the attacker) and with probability of providing correct output by any unit. The system success probability always increases in the total number of voting units, the defender–attacker resource ratio, and the probability that each voting unit produces a correct output. The system success probability increases in the attacker–defender contest intensity if the defender achieves per-unit resource superiority, and otherwise decreases in the contest intensity. The presented model and enumerative algorithm allow obtaining optimal voting system defense strategy for any combination of parameters: total number of units, attack and defense resources, unit success probability and contest intensity.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2012.10.004

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ress.2012.10.004;
PII
S0951-8320(12)00204-9;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Reliability Engineering and System Safety
Journal Volume
111
Journal Page Range
p. 37-44
ISSN
0951-8320
CODEN
RESSEP

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
44115266
Subject category
S42: ENGINEERING;
Descriptors DEI
ALGORITHMS; DATA PROCESSING; DECISION MAKING; ENGINEERED SAFETY SYSTEMS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PROBABILITY; SAFETY; SIGNALS
Descriptors DEC
MATHEMATICAL LOGIC; PROCESSING

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2012 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.