Published March 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Simulation studies of divertor detachment and critical power exhaust parameters for Japanese DEMO design

  • 1. National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (QST), Naka, Ibaraki 311-0193 (Japan)
  • 2. Graduate School of Science and Technology, Keio University, Yokohama 223-8522 (Japan)
  • 3. National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (QST), Rokkasho, Aomori 039-3212 (Japan)

Description

Highlights: • Simulation study for the divertor design of Japanese fusion DEMO reactor. • Systematic scans of critical power exhaust parameters for the divertor operation. • Heat load and detachment plasma profiles were evaluated in the low density condition. • Restrictions of the divertor operation under more severe conditions were determined. Handling of a large thermal power exhausted from the confined plasma is one of the most important issues for ITER and DEMO. A conventional divertor, which has the closed geometry similar to that of ITER and longer leg of 1.6 m, was proposed for the Japanese (JA) DEMO reactor (Rp/ap = 8.5/2.42 m). A radiative cooling scenario of Ar impurity seeding and the divertor performance have been demonstrated by SONIC simulation, in order to evaluate the power exhaust in JA-DEMO 2014 (primary design with Psep ~ 283 MW) and JA-DEMO with higher plasma elongation (a revised design with Psep ~ 235 MW). The divertor operation with the peak qtarget ≤ 10 MWm−2 was determined in the low nesep of 2–3 × 1019 m−3 under the severe conditions of reducing radiation loss fraction, i.e. f*raddiv = (Pradsol + Praddiv)/Psep, and diffusion coefficients (χ and D). The divertor geometry and reference key parameters (f*raddiv ~ 0.8, χ = 1 m2/s and D = 0.3 m2/s) were so far consistent with the power exhaust concepts in the nesep range, and the revised JA-DEMO design has advantages of wider nesep range and enough margin for the divertor operation. For either severe assumption of f*raddiv ~ 0.7 or χ and D to the half value, higher nesep operation was required for the primary design in order to control the peak qtarget ≤ 10 MWm−2, i.e. the operation window was reduced. Applying the two severe assumptions, the divertor operation was difficult in the low nesep range for the both designs.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nme.2020.100864

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.nme.2020.100864;
PII
S2352179120301319;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Nuclear Materials and Energy
Journal Volume
26
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
2352-1791

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Collaborations
Joint Special Design Team for Fusion DEMO