Published May 2009 | Version v1
Journal article

An evaluation of current methods of diagnosing colorectal cancer in the United Kingdom

  • 1. Band 6 Radiographer, X-ray West, Derriford Hospital, Derriford Road, Plymouth PL6 8DH (United Kingdom)
  • 2. Radiotherapy, Room 2K06, Glenside Campus, University of the West of England, Faculty of Health and Social Care, Blackberry Hill, Stapleton, Bristol BS16 1DD (United Kingdom)

Description

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a highly conversed topic, particularly since implementation of screening for CRC is imminent within the U.K. Aims: The aim of this research project was to examine the diagnostic tools currently used within the UK to detect CRC and their impact on the aetiology and epidemiology of CRC. Methodology: The complexity of the research topic lent itself towards a literature review. A systematic approach of researching was therefore adopted to analyse and critically evaluate the reliability and validity of articles. Electronic databases including AMED, Cancerlit, CINHAL, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE and EBM-Reviews were utilised to provide a wide spectrum of recent and relevant articles. Other research strategies involved looking for books relating to the topics, which were kept to within 6 years of publication to maintain accuracy of information. Selected websites, such as NICE, the Department of Health, NHS websites and Cancer Research U.K. were useful at explaining current and future screening plans and trials within Britain and allowed the study of reliable U.K. statistics. The research articles were then outlined and placed into sections of similar topic areas, which enabled the author to compare, contrast and evaluate the hypotheses. By organising the research in this way, a thorough review of the existing research for CRC was resultant. Results: A range of diagnostic tools is currently in use for detecting CRC within the UK. Screening for asymptomatic individuals aged 55-60 years+, (the age range where CRC incidence is higher), would provide the most effective reduction in CRC incidence and mortality rates. Conclusions: The use of a multi-phasic screening programme consisting of faecal occult blood tests (FOBt) and a whole bowel examination is considered to be the most effective diagnostic tools. However, preventative schemes, such as better education of the risks and symptoms of CRC, supported by the NHS Cancer Plan (2000), have demonstrated to be a vital adjunct to CRC screening to reduce the incidence and mortality of the disease.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2008.10.004

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.radi.2008.10.004;
PII
S1078-8174(08)00105-3;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Radiography (London 1995)
Journal Volume
15
Journal Issue
2
Journal Page Range
p. 106-112
ISSN
1078-8174

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
41026796
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
EPIDEMIOLOGY; LARGE INTESTINE; NEOPLASMS; REVIEWS; SCREENING; UNITED KINGDOM
Descriptors DEC
BODY; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; DISEASES; DOCUMENT TYPES; EUROPE; GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT; INTESTINES; ORGANS; WESTERN EUROPE

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2008 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.