Published October 2023 | Version v1
Journal article

Over 100 mV VOC improvement for rear passivated ACIGS ultra-thin solar cells

  • 1. Departamento de Física, Universidade de Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, 3810‐193 (Portugal)
  • 2. i3N, Universidade de Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, 3810‐193 (Portugal)
  • 3. INL - International Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory, Avenida Mestre José Veiga, Braga, 4715‐330 (Portugal)
  • 4. CFisUC, Department of Physics, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, 3004‐516 (Portugal)
  • 5. Departamento de Ciência dos Materiais, NOVA School of Science and Technology, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Caparica, 2829‐516 (Portugal)
  • 6. EnergyVille 2, Genk, 3600 (Belgium)
  • 7. Institute for Material Research (IMO), Hasselt University (partner in Solliance), Diepenbeek, 3590 (Belgium)
  • 8. Imec division IMOMEC (partner in Solliance), Diepenbeek, 3590 (Belgium)
  • 9. CIETI, Departamento de Física, Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto, Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Porto, 4200‐072 (Portugal)
  • 10. Ångström Laboratory, Department of Engineering Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, 751 21 (Sweden)

Description

A decentralized energy system requires photovoltaic solutions to meet new aesthetic paradigms, such as lightness, flexibility, and new form factors. Notwithstanding, the materials shortage in the Green Transition is a concern gaining momentum due to their foreseen continuous demand. A fruitful strategy to shrink the absorber thickness, meeting aesthetic and shortage materials consumption targets, arises from interface passivation. However, a deep understanding of passivated systems is required to close the efficiency gap between ultra-thin and thin film devices, and to mono-Si. Herein, a (Ag,Cu)(In,Ga)Se2 ultra-thin solar cell, with 92% passivated rear interface area, is compared with a conventional nonpassivated counterpart. A thin MoSe2 layer, for a quasi-ohmic contact, is present in the two architectures at the contacts, despite the passivated device narrow line scheme. The devices present striking differences in charge carrier dynamics. Electrical and optoelectronic analysis combined with SCAPS modelling suggest a lower recombination rate for the passivated device, through a reduction on the rear surface recombination velocity and overall defects, comparing with the reference solar cell. The new architecture allows for a 2% efficiency improvement on a 640 nm ultra-thin device, from 11% to 13%, stemming from an open circuit voltage increase of 108 mV. (© 2023 Wiley‐VCH GmbH)

Availability note (English)

Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202303188

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Advanced Functional Materials (Internet)
Journal Volume
33
Journal Issue
44
Journal Page Range
p. 1-16
ISSN
1616-3028
CODEN
AFMDC6

Optional Information

Notes
AID: 2303188