Simulation of Hp(10) and effective dose received by the medical staff in interventional radiology procedures
Creators
- 1. ENEA—IRP, Radiation Protection Institute, 4 Via Martiri di Monte Sole, 40129 Bologna (Italy)
- 2. Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Nuclear Waste Disposal, Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen (Germany)
- 3. Faculty of Science, University of Kragujevac, R. Domanovica 12, 34000 Kragujevac (Serbia)
- 4. Department of Physics, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH United Kingdom (United Kingdom)
- 5. National Research Center for Radiation Medicine, Melnikova street 53, 04050 Kyiv (Ukraine)
- 6. Biomedical Engineering department, 8701 W Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee (United States)
- 7. AOSP S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Via Massarenti, 9. 40138 Bologna (Italy)
- 8. University of Osijek UNIOS Faculty of Medicine, Josipa Huttlera 4 HR—31000 Osijek (Croatia)
- 9. AUSL Reggio Emilia IRCCS, Viale Risorgimento, 80, 42123 Reggio Emilia (RE) (Italy)
Description
Interventional radiology and cardiology are widespread employed techniques for diagnosis and treatment of several pathologies because they avoid the majority of the side-effects associated with surgical treatments, but are known to increase the radiation exposure to patient and operators. In recent years many studies treated the exposure of the operators performing cardiological procedures. The aim of this work is to study the exposure condition of the medical staff in some selected interventional radiology procedures. The Monte Carlo simulations have been employed with anthropomorphic mathematical phantoms reproducing the irradiation scenario of the medical staff with two operators and the patient. A personal dosemeter, put on apron, was modelled for comparison with measurements performed in hospitals, done with electronic dosemeters, in a reduced number of interventional radiology practices. Within the limits associated to the use of numerical anthropomorphic models to mimic a complex interventional procedure, the personal dose equivalent, H p(10), was evaluated and normalised to the simulated Kerma-Area Product, KAP, value, indeed the effective dose has been calculated. The H p(10)/KAPvalue of the first operator is about 10 μSv/Gy.cm2, when ceiling shielding is not used. This value is calculated on the trunk and it varies of +/−30% moving the dosemeter to the waist or to the neck. The effective dose, normalised to the KAP value, varies between 0.03 and 0.4 μSv/Gy.cm2. Considering all the unavoidable approximation of this kind of investigations, the comparisons with hospital measurement and literature data showed a good agreement allowing to use of the present results for dosimetric characterisation of interventional radiology procedures. (paper)
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ab2c42Additional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Journal of Radiological Protection
- Journal Volume
- 39
- Journal Issue
- 3
- Journal Page Range
- p. 809-824
- ISSN
- 0952-4746
- CODEN
- JRPREA
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 51078291
- Subject category
- S61: RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY;
- Descriptors DEI
- APPROXIMATIONS; BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; DIAGNOSIS; DOSE EQUIVALENTS; DOSEMETERS; EFFECTIVE RADIATION DOSES; HOSPITALS; IRRADIATION; KERMA; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NECK; PATHOLOGY; PATIENTS; PHANTOMS; SHIELDING; SIDE EFFECTS; SURGERY
- Descriptors DEC
- BODY; BUILDINGS; CALCULATION METHODS; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DOSES; MEASURING INSTRUMENTS; MEDICAL ESTABLISHMENTS; MEDICINE; MOCKUP; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; RADIATION DOSES; RADIOLOGY; SIMULATION; STRUCTURAL MODELS