Net energy from nuclear power
Creators
- 1. Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Inc., Tenn. (USA)
Description
Non-fission energy inputs to nuclear fuel cycles were calculated for four types of power reactors and for two grades of uranium ore. Inputs included all requirements for process operations, materials, and facility construction. Process stages are mining, milling, uranium conversion, enrichment, fuel fabrication, reprocessing, waste disposal, reactor construction and operation, and all transportation. Principal inputs were analyzed explicitly; small contributions and facility construction were obtained from input-output tables. For major facilities, the latter approach was based on disaggregated descriptions. Enrichment energy was that of U.S. diffusion plants, with uranium tails assay retained as a variable parameter. Supplemental electrical requirements, as a percentage of lifetime electrical output, are 5-6% for LWRs (0.3 - 0.2% tails assay) using ores with 0.2% uranium and without recycle. Recycle of uranium and plutonium reduces the electrical requirements 30%. Chattanooga Shales (0.006% U) require one-third more electricity. Thermal energy requirements are about 5% of electrical output with conventional ores; shales raise this to about 14%, with 0.2% enrichment tails and full recycle. About one-tenth of the electrical supplements and about a third of the thermal energy supplements are required prior to operation. A typical LWR will repay its energy loan within 15 months, allowing for low initial load factors. Enrichment requiring only 10% as much separative work as gaseous diffusion would reduce electrical requirements about 80%, but have little effect on thermal energy inputs. HTGRs require slightly less supplemental energy than LWRs. HWRs (with natural uranium) require about one-third as much supplemental electricity, but half again as much thermal energy, largely for heavy water production. The paper presents detailed data for several combinations of reactor type, ore grade and tails assay and compares them with conventional power plants. It also exhibits running fuel and energy accounts for realistic nuclear power programs
Availability note (English)
MF available from INIS under the Report Number.Files
8303879.pdf
Files
(341.5 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:02261a65cc0a410caf3336fce9d53d67
|
341.5 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Imprint Pagination
- 6 p.
- Report number
- IAEA-CN--36/399
Conference
- Title
- International conference on nuclear power and its fuel cycles.
- Dates
- 2 - 13 May 1977.
- Place
- Salzburg, Austria.
INIS
- Country of Publication
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 8303879
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY; S11: NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS;
- Resource subtype / Literary indicator
- Conference
- Descriptors DEI
- BWR TYPE REACTORS; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; CONSTRUCTION; COST; ECONOMICS; ENERGY BALANCE; FABRICATION; FUEL CYCLE; FUEL ELEMENTS; HEAVY WATER MODERATED REACTORS; HTGR TYPE REACTORS; ISOTOPE SEPARATION; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; ORE PROCESSING; POWER GENERATION; PWR TYPE REACTORS; RADIOACTIVE WASTE PROCESSING; REACTOR OPERATION; REPROCESSING
- Descriptors DEC
- GAS COOLED REACTORS; GRAPHITE MODERATED REACTORS; MANAGEMENT; NUCLEAR FACILITIES; OPERATION; POWER PLANTS; REACTOR COMPONENTS; REACTORS; SEPARATION PROCESSES; THERMAL POWER PLANTS; WASTE MANAGEMENT; WASTE PROCESSING; WATER COOLED REACTORS; WATER MODERATED REACTORS
Optional Information
- Notes
- 2.1.-.T.1./09 8 tables.