Average glandular dose in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of phantom and patient data
Creators
- 1. Dutch reference centre for screening, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre (LRCB), PO Box6873, 6503 GJ Nijmegen (Netherlands)
- 2. National Co-ordinating Centre for the Physics of Mammography (NCCPM), Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford GU2 7XX, United Kingdom and Department of Physics, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH (United Kingdom)
- 3. Reference centre for Mammography Southwest Germany, Bahnhofstrasse 7, 35037 Marburg (Germany)
- 4. Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 5800 6202 AZ Maastricht (Netherlands)
Description
For the evaluation of the average glandular dose (AGD) in digital mammography (DM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) phantoms simulating standard model breasts are used. These phantoms consist of slabs of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) or a combination of PMMA and polyethylene (PE). In the last decades the automatic exposure control (AEC) increased in complexity and became more sensitive to (local) differences in breast composition. The question is how well the AGD estimated using these simple dosimetry phantoms agrees with the average patient AGD. In this study the AGDs for both dosimetry phantoms and for patients have been evaluated for 5 different x-ray systems in DM and DBT modes. It was found that the ratios between patient and phantom AGD did not differ considerably using both dosimetry phantoms. These ratios averaged over all breast thicknesses were 1.14 and 1.15 for the PMMA and PMMA-PE dosimetry phantoms respectively in DM mode and 1.00 and 1.02 in the DBT mode. These ratios were deemed to be sufficiently close to unity to be suitable for dosimetry evaluation in quality control procedures. However care should be taken when comparing systems for DM and DBT since depending on the AEC operation, ratios for particular breast thicknesses may differ substantially (0.83–1.96). Although the predictions of both phantoms are similar we advise the use of PMMA + PE slabs for both DM and DBT to harmonize dosimetry protocols and avoid any potential issues with the use of spacers with the PMMA phantoms. (paper)
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/60/20/7893Additional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Physics in Medicine and Biology
- Journal Volume
- 60
- Journal Issue
- 20
- Journal Page Range
- p. 7893-7907
- ISSN
- 0031-9155
- CODEN
- PHMBA7
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 47076022
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY; DOSIMETRY; MAMMARY GLANDS; PATIENTS; PHANTOMS; PMMA; POLYETHYLENES; QUALITY CONTROL; RADIATION DOSES; STANDARD MODEL; THICKNESS; X RADIATION
- Descriptors DEC
- BODY; CONTROL; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DIMENSIONS; DOSES; ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION; ESTERS; FIELD THEORIES; GLANDS; GRAND UNIFIED THEORY; IONIZING RADIATIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MEDICINE; MOCKUP; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; ORGANIC POLYMERS; ORGANS; PARTICLE MODELS; POLYACRYLATES; POLYMERS; POLYOLEFINS; POLYVINYLS; QUANTUM FIELD THEORY; RADIATIONS; RADIOLOGY; STRUCTURAL MODELS; UNIFIED GAUGE MODELS