Published December 2012
| Version v1
Journal article
Comparison and analysis for item classifications between AP1000 and traditional PWR
Description
The comparison and analysis for the safety classification, seismic category, code classification and QA classification between AP1000 and traditional PWR were presented. The safety could be guaranteed and the construction and manufacture costs could be cut down since all sorts of AP1000 classifications. It is suggested that the QA classification and the QA requirements correspond to the national conditions should be drafted in the process of AP1000 domestication. (authors)
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Nuclear Safety (Beijing)
- Journal Issue
- 4
- Journal Page Range
- p. 32-35
- ISSN
- 1672-5360
INIS
- Country of Publication
- China
- Country of Input or Organization
- China
- INIS RN
- 47112488
- Subject category
- S21: SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS;
- Descriptors DEI
- CHINA; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; CONSTRUCTION; COST; MANUFACTURING; PROGRAM MANAGEMENT; PWR TYPE REACTORS; QUALITY ASSURANCE; SAFETY; SEISMIC EFFECTS; USA
- Descriptors DEC
- ASIA; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; ENRICHED URANIUM REACTORS; EVALUATION; MANAGEMENT; NORTH AMERICA; POWER REACTORS; REACTORS; THERMAL REACTORS; WATER COOLED REACTORS; WATER MODERATED REACTORS
Optional Information
- Notes
- 3 tabs., 11 refs.