Published May 18, 2017 | Version v1
Miscellaneous Restricted

A comparative analysis of the local geopolitics of nuclear power in Germany, France and Sweden

Description

The Fukushima atomic disaster had different political fallouts in the thirty-one countries where nuclear power is exploited. In Europe, while Germany decided to accelerate the phase-out engaged ten years before, the Swedish government repealed the moratorium on new nuclear reactors introduced in 1981 and France only committed to reduce marginally the share of nuclear electricity. Three European countries, facing the same event, took three different directions. In the past, differences between countries' nuclear policies have been explained by economic, geographical or cultural determinism. This work offers to go beyond these approaches and to consider energy policies as the result of power struggles between opponents and supporters of atomic energy who fight to control the territory. Thanks to the local geopolitical approach, this thesis aims at highlighting the rivalries and the representation which structure the actors' systems in each country as well as the strategies used in the conflict. In a context where nuclear energy is portrayed as a potential solution to mitigate climate change, the purpose of this work is to identity the elements which led to the elaboration of diametrically opposed energy policies in France, Germany and Sweden. (author)

Abstract (French)

L'accident nucleaire de Fukushima en mars 2011 a eu des repercussions politiques differentes dans la trentaine d'etats exploitant un parc de centrales. Tandis que l'Allemagne decidait d'accelerer la sortie du nucleaire amorcee dix ans auparavant, la Suede abrogeait le moratoire introduit en 1981 sur la construction de nouveaux reacteurs et la France ne s'engageait qu'a diminuer marginalement la part du nucleaire dans son mix electrique. Trois pays europeens, confrontes a un meme evenement, prenaient ainsi trois directions opposees. Par le passe, les differences de politiques nucleaires ont ete expliquees par des determinismes geographiques, culturels, evenementiels ou economiques. Cette these propose de depasser ces approches pour considerer ces choix comme le resultat de rapports de forces entre opposants et soutiens a l'energie atomique s'affrontant, a plusieurs echelles, pour controler l'usage du territoire. En s'appuyant sur la methode de la geopolitique locale, cette recherche vise a mettre en evidence les rivalites de pouvoirs et les representations qui structurent les systemes d'acteurs dans chacun des pays, ainsi que les strategies mises en oeuvre. Dans un contexte de transition energetique ou le nucleaire est presente comme une solution aux bouleversements climatiques, il s'agit ici, grace a une approche comparative, d'identifier en Allemagne, en France et en Suede, les elements ayant conduit a l'elaboration de politiques energetiques diametralement differentes. (auteur)

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted to users with access.

Additional details

Additional titles

Original title (French)
Une analyse comparative des geopolitiques du nucleaire civil en Allemagne, en France et en Suede

Publishing Information

Imprint Pagination
686 p.
Report number
FRNC-TH--15842

Optional Information

Notes
[500 refs.]; Available from the INIS Liaison Officer for France, see the INIS website for current contact and E-mail addresses