Filters
Results 1 - 10 of 7893
Results 1 - 10 of 7893.
Search took: 0.035 seconds
Sort by: date | relevance |
AbstractAbstract
[en] Decommissioning alternatives include initial mothballing with removal after a cooldown period, initial entombment with removal after a cooldown period, and prompt removal at the end of operating life. The last alternative, with funding of the cost during the life of the plant, would provide the greatest benefit to all concerned
Primary Subject
Record Type
Journal Article
Journal
Power Eng; ISSN 0032-5961;
; v. 82(12); p. 53-56

Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
AbstractAbstract
No abstract available
Primary Subject
Source
American Nuclear Society's annual meeting; Miami Beach, FL (USA); 7 - 12 Jun 1981; CONF-810606--; Published in summary form only.
Record Type
Journal Article
Literature Type
Conference
Journal
Transactions of the American Nuclear Society; ISSN 0003-018X;
; v. 38 p. 136-137

Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
AbstractAbstract
[en] Discussed are: Basic questions of financing, to bring in the decommissioning costs with reference to the various types of enterprises, questions of taxes, use of the accumulated liquid means, the economy of nuclear facilities taking into account the decommissioning expenses. (HP)
[de]
Es werden diskutiert: grundsaetzliche Fragen der Finanzierung, Erwirtschaftung der Stillegungskosten bei verschiedenen Unternehmensformen, steuerliche Fragen, Verwendung der angesammelten liquiden Mittel, Wirtschaftlichkeit kerntechnischer Anlagen unter Beruecksichtigung des Stillegungsaufwandes. (HP)Original Title
Wirtschaftliche Probleme im Zusammenhang mit der Stillegung kerntechnischer Anlagen
Primary Subject
Source
Lukes, R. (ed.) (Muenster Univ. (Germany, F.R.). Inst. fuer Arbeits- und Wirtschaftsrecht); Recht - Technik - Wirtschaft; v. 14; p. 133-139; ISBN 3 452 18298 3;
; 1977; p. 133-139; Heymanns; Koeln, Germany, F.R; 5. German symposium on nuclear law; Muenster, Germany, F.R; 8 - 10 Dec 1976; AED-CONF--76-686-013

Record Type
Book
Literature Type
Conference
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
AbstractAbstract
[en] In connection with the required technical and physical measures, the legal obligations of nuclear waste management and reactor decommissioning, the question arose as to what the economic consequences would be. Not only waste management cost but also reactor shut-down and decommissioning costs and had to be determined. In addition, one had to find out how to take these costs into account as fas as economy in operation and balance sheets were concerned. Bearing this in mind, the Vereinigung Deutscher Elektrizitaetswerke (VDEW) (association of German power plants) had ordered the Nuklear-Ingenieur Service GmbH (NIS) to deliver an expert opinion on the reactor shutdown and decommissioning costs to be expected. As this report has been available since June 1980, the following contribution discusses relevant aspects relating to balance sheets and economy in operation. (orig./UA)
[de]
Im Zusammenhang mit den erforderlichen technisch-physikalischen Massnahmen und den rechtlichen Verpflichtungen zur Beseitigung nuklearer Abfaelle und Anlagen ergaben sich Fragen nach den wirtschaftlichen Konsequenzen. So mussten nicht nur die Kosten fuer die Entsorgung bestrahlter Brennelemente sondern auch die Kosten fuer die Stillegung und die Beseitigung von Kernkraftwerken bzw. Anlagenkomponenten ermittelt werden. Ausserdem war die betriebswirtschaftliche und bilanzielle Beruecksichtigung dieser Kosten noch im einzelnen zu klaeren. Im Hinblick darauf hat die Vereinigung Deutscher Elektrizitaetswerke (VDEW) Mitte 1976 die Nuklear-Ingenieur-Service GmbH (NIS) beauftragt, ein Gutachten ueber die zu erwartenden Kosten der Stillegung und Beseitigung von Kernkraftwerken zu erstellen. Nachdem dieses Gutachten seit Juni 1980 vorliegt, sollen in dem nachfolgenden Beitrag ergaenzend die hiermit verbundenen bilanziellen und betriebswirtschaftlichen Aspekte eroertert werden. (orig./UA)Original Title
Die Bildung von Rueckstellungen fuer die Kosten der Stillegung und Beseitigung von Kernkraftwerken
Primary Subject
Source
Record Type
Journal Article
Journal
Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen; ISSN 0013-743X;
; v. 32(8); p. 657-661

Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
AbstractAbstract
[en] The objective of the work programme is to develop a concept of data bank for evaluating decommissioning cost and radiation exposure on the basis of existing data. In the first step we have defined a methodology for extrapolating experience relating to cost and occupational radiation exposure, gained in the decommissioning of specific installations (e.g. pilot dismantling projects), to the future decommissioning of various installations. In the second step we collect existing and available basic data. (author)
Primary Subject
Source
Pflugrad, K.; Bisci, R.; Huber, B.; Skupinski, E. (Commission of the European Communities, Brussels (Belgium). Directorate General for Science, Research and Development) (eds.); 858 p; ISBN 1-85166-523-4;
; 1990; p. 85-92; Elsevier Applied Science; Barking (UK); International conference on the decommissioning of nuclear installations; Brussels (Belgium); 24-27 Oct 1989

Record Type
Book
Literature Type
Conference
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
Cole, Matt
WM Symposia, 1628 E. Southern Avenue, Suite 9-332, Tempe, AZ 85282 (United States)2012
WM Symposia, 1628 E. Southern Avenue, Suite 9-332, Tempe, AZ 85282 (United States)2012
AbstractAbstract
[en] Nuclear reactors come in a wide variety of styles, size, and ages. However, during decommissioned one issue they all share is the balancing of remotely and manually activities. For the majority of tasks there is a desire to use manual methods because remote working can be slower, more expensive, and less reliable. However, because of the unique hazards of nuclear reactors some level of remote activity will be necessary to provide adequate safety to workers and properly managed and designed it does not need to be difficult nor expensive. The balance of remote versus manual work can also affect the amount and types of waste that is generated. S.A.Technology (SAT) has worked on a number of reactor decommissioning projects over the last two decades and has a range of experience with projects using remote methods to those relying primarily on manual activities. This has created a set of lessons learned and best practices on how to balance the need for remote handling and manual operations. Finding a balance between remote and manual operations on reactor decommissioning can be difficult but by following certain broad guidelines it is possible to have a very successfully decommissioning. It is important to have an integrated team that includes remote handling experts and that this team plans the work using characterization efforts that are efficient and realistic. The equipment need to be simple, robust and flexible and supported by an on-site team committed to adapting to day-to-day challenges. Also, the waste strategy needs to incorporate the challenges of remote activities in its planning. (authors)
Primary Subject
Secondary Subject
Source
2012; 8 p; WM2012: Waste Management 2012 conference on improving the future in waste management; Phoenix, AZ (United States); 26 Feb - 1 Mar 2012; Available online from: http://www.wmsym.org/archives/2012/index.html; Country of input: France
Record Type
Miscellaneous
Literature Type
Conference
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
AbstractAbstract
[en] Over the past 35 years, considerable experience has been gained in decommissioning many types of nuclear facilities. By the turn of the century, more than 60 nuclear power plants and 250 research reactors around the world will become likely candidates for decommissioning. Several factors influence the choice of decommissioning strategy in a country and consequently, the decommissioning cost estimates performed are difficult to compare. International efforts to harmonize the various estimates are essential. The IAEA introduced the concept of various cost elements or components, a suggested methodology and it has also undertaken, in its 1991-92 programme, some specific studies on a common methodology for decommissioning cost estimation. 2 figs, 1 map, 2 tabs
Primary Subject
Record Type
Journal Article
Journal
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
AbstractAbstract
No abstract available
Primary Subject
Source
1978 winter meeting of American Nuclear Society; Washington, DC, USA; 12 - 16 Nov 1978; CONF-7811109--; Published in summary form only.
Record Type
Journal Article
Literature Type
Conference
Journal
Transactions of the American Nuclear Society; v. 30 p. 551
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
AbstractAbstract
[en] Short communication
Original Title
Raboty po dezaktivatsii i vyvodu iz ekspluatatsii yadernykh ustanovok v ANL
Primary Subject
Source
Koltysheva, G.I.; Perepelkin, I.G. (eds.); Ministerstvo Nauki-Akademiya Nauk, Almaty (Kazakstan); Minesterstvo Ehnergetiki i Ugol'noj Promyshlennosti, Alma-Ata (Kazakstan); Ministerstvo Ehkonomiki, Almaty (Kazakstan); Natsional'nyj Yadernyj Tsentr, Kurchatov (Kazakstan); Natsional'naya Aktsionernaya Kompaniya KATEhP, Almaty (Kazakstan); Nauchno-Issledovatel'skij Inst. Ehksperimental'noj i Teoreticheskoj Fiziki Natsional'nogo Gosudarstvennogo Univ., Almaty (Kazakstan); Agentstvo po Atomnoj Ehnergii, Alma-Ata (Kazakstan); Yadernoe Obshchestvo Respubliki Kazakhstan, Kurchatov (Kazakstan); Aktauskaya Gorodskaya Administratsiya, Aktau (Kazakstan); Mangyshlakskij Atomno-Ehnergeticheskij Kombinat, Aktau (Kazakstan); Ministerstvo Rossijskoj Federatsii po Atomnoj Ehnergii, Moscow (Russian Federation); Rossijskij Nauchnyj Tsentr 'Kurchatovskij Inst.', Moscow (Russian Federation); Gosudarstvennyj Nauchno-Issledovatel'skij Inst. NPO Luch, Podol'sk (Russian Federation); Yadernoe Obshchestvo, Moscow (Russian Federation); 150 p; Jun 1996; p. 19; Sigma; Kurchatov (Kazakstan); International scientific-practical conference: nuclear power engineering in the Republic of Kazakstan. Perspectives of development (NE-96); Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya: yadernaya ehnergetika v Respublike Kazakhstan. Perspektivy razvitiya (YaEh-96); Aktau (Kazakstan); 24-27 Jun 1996
Record Type
Miscellaneous
Literature Type
Conference
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
Related RecordRelated Record
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
Suchowitz, M.
Proceedings of NEA Workshop on storage with surveillance versus immediate decommissioning for nuclear reactors1985
Proceedings of NEA Workshop on storage with surveillance versus immediate decommissioning for nuclear reactors1985
AbstractAbstract
[en] After the shut-down decision, the technical effort necessary to place a reactor facility in the ''storage with surveillance'' condition is relatively minor. The operating costs during the storage time depend on whether a second power plant unit is located or is being constructed at the site. If the reactor facility is totally removed after the decision to shut it down, the resulting costs are at first not comparable to those incurred by the bringing about of ''storage with surveillance''. Because the nuclear power plant ''stored with surveillance'' will have to be removed at the end of the storage time, enormously high costs once again are the result here too. The savings resulting because the need for remotely controlled dismantling and packing of parts with higher activity (reactor vessel, core fixtures, etc.) is eliminated, do not, from a technical point of view, outweigh the disadvantages of the surveillance and maintenance necessary during a storage time of 40 years. It is to be noted, however, that during a total removal, large quantities of radioactive waste result and suitable repositories or storage possibilities must be available
Primary Subject
Secondary Subject
Source
Nuclear Energy Agency, 75 - Paris (France); 180 p; ISBN 92-64-02724-6;
; 1985; p. 170-175; OECD; Paris (France); NEA workshop on storage with surveillance versus immediate decommissioning for nuclear reactors; Paris (France); 22-24 Oct 1984

Record Type
Book
Literature Type
Conference
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
Related RecordRelated Record
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
1 | 2 | 3 | Next |