[en] With its verdict of 3rd September 1981 the LG Munich has, on account of the action of Bayernwerk AG and Kraftwerk Union AG, sentenced two physicists working at the University of Bremen to abstain from the following, avoiding a fine of up to 100 000.- DM: maintaining, disseminating and/or maintaining or having be disseminated verbally or in its contents, neither directly nor by disseminating a text that a) structural parts of inferiors quality had been fitted into the Grafenrheinfeld upp contrary to regulations, b) a new quality assessment had been made later which the Technical Supervisory Board had approved of, c) if the reactor was to be commissioned with its present technical equipment, the probability of a serious accident would be increased considerably. (orig./HP)

[en] The basic right of assembly does not entitle to hold the assembly, against the land owner's will (here Grafenrheinfeld NPP), against whom the demonstration is directed, on his land. An order given by the administrative body which takes into account a wish of the land owner as regards the place of the assembly on private land, does not infringe the basic right of assembly. (Supreme Court of Bavaria, ruling of 29-09-1994 (4 St RR 92/94)). (orig./HP)

[en] No new nuclear power plant has been put into operation in the Federal Republic of Germany for more than two years. With the nuclear power plant Grafenrheinfeld (KKG) near Schweinfurt the Bayernwerk AG now put an end to this pause. More than ten years after application for the construction permit, the operator could take over the 1225 MWsub(e)(net) pressurized water reactor from the manufacturer KWU. Despite delay of construction and increase of costs the KKG will supply electricity which is cheaper by at least 3,5 Pfennigs/kWh than on oil- or hard coal-fired basic load power plant could do - an annual saving of approximately DM 280 million. (orig.)

[en] With its decision of April 21, 1980 - W 122 79 -, the Administrative Court has rejected three Bremen plaintiffs who also acted as counsels for 136 further plaintiffs in various parts of West Germany, West Berlin and other states in the action at law against the licenses granted for Grafenrheinfeld nuclear power plant, in their function as counsels for the plaintiff. The main grounds of the decision are presented in full wording. (orig./HP)

[en] With its decision of April 30, 1980, - BVerwG 7 C 91.79 - the Federal Administrative Court has dismissed the appeal of the city of Schweinfurt against the interim decision of the Bavarian Administrative Court of April 9, 1979. The cost will have to be paid by the plaintiff. The value of the appeal suit is set at DM 100.000. The main grounds for the decision are given in full wording. (orig./HP)

[en] With its decision of April 30, 1980 - BVerwG 7 C 88.79-, the Federal Administrative Court has dismissed an appeal against the decision of the Bavarian Administrative Court, in which the plaintiff's action had been dismissed. The cost of the appeal suit will be paid by the plaintiff. The value in litigation was set at DM 20,000 for the appeal proceedings. The grounds for the decision are given in full wording. (orig./HP)

No abstract available

[en] After several weeks of trial operation at the full power of 1225 MW, the Grafenrheinfeld Nuclear Power Station near Schweinfurt was delivered to the operator, Bayernwerk AG, by the manufacturer, Kraftwerk Union AG, on June 17, 1982 as agreed upon. For the operator this means an increase to 25 % of the share of nuclear power in its installed capacity. In the course of its commissioning in steps since late 1981, the Grafenrheinfeld plant has already generated some 2.5 billion kWh of electricity, which is roughly 5% of the annual electricity requirement in Bavaria. (orig.)

[en] The Bavarian Administrative Court with its decision of 23rd October 1975 - No. 98 VI 75 - has rejected with costs the appeal of a citizen of the town of Schweinfurt against the administrative court of Wuerzburg's refusal of his application for suspension of the immediate execution of the partial licence notice for the erection of the nuclear power plant Grafenrheinfeld, a corresponding application by the town Schweinfurt having already been rejected by the Bavarian administrative court with decision dated 22nd Nov 1974. The grounds for the new decision are on the whole in line with those for the 1974 decision. Because of a few pecularities, extracts from the new decision are given. (orig./LN)

[en] On the decision of the Bavarian Administrative Court of November 22, 1974, the decision of the Wuerzburg administrative court of August 26, 1974 (ET 11/74, p. 587) ordering a stop of construction in the Grafenrheinfeld nuclear power station was reversed on the appeal of Bayernwerk AG and Kraftwerk Union AG. The costs, including the extrajudicial costs of the two companies under subpoena as witnesses, were awarded against the petitioner - the city of Schweinfurt. The value of matter in controversy was taxed at 50,000 DM. The substance of the opinion is given in the article. (orig./AK)