Filters
Results 1 - 10 of 19491
Results 1 - 10 of 19491.
Search took: 0.05 seconds
Sort by: date | relevance |
Sharples, F.E.
Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (USA)1987
Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (USA)1987
AbstractAbstract
[en] The particular cleanup standards applied at a remedial action site will depend upon a variety of site-specific factors as well as which of the hazardous waste statutes is jurisdictionally applied. Parties who are currently participating in remedial action planning activities should be aware that applicable cleanup standards may be in large part open to negotiation with regulators
Primary Subject
Secondary Subject
Source
Feb 1987; 4 p; Oak Ridge model conference; Oak Ridge, TN (USA); 3-5 Feb 1987; Available from NTIS, PC A02/MF A01 as DE87004903
Record Type
Report
Literature Type
Conference
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
Parker, D.L.
USDOE Richland Operations Office, WA (United States). Funding organisation: USDOE, Washington, DC (United States)1993
USDOE Richland Operations Office, WA (United States). Funding organisation: USDOE, Washington, DC (United States)1993
AbstractAbstract
[en] The purpose of this interim remedial measures (IRM) proposed plan is to present and solicit public comments on the IRM planned for the 200-ZP-1 Operable Unit at the Hanford Site in Washington state. The 200-ZP-1 is one of two operable units that envelop the groundwater beneath the 200 West Area of the Hanford Site
Primary Subject
Secondary Subject
Source
Dec 1993; 20 p; Also available from OSTI as DE94005486; NTIS; US Govt. Printing Office Dep
Record Type
Report
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
AbstractAbstract
[en] New and emerging technologies are making decommissioning and remediation more cost effective, faster and safer. From planning to execution and control, the use of new technologies is on the rise. Before starting decommissioning or environmental remediation, experts need to plan each step of the process, and to do that, they first need a clear idea of the characteristics of the structure and the level of radiation that they can expect to encounter.
Primary Subject
Secondary Subject
Source
Also available on-line: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/5712223_zt.pdf
Record Type
Journal Article
Journal
IAEA Bulletin (Online); ISSN 1564-2690;
; v. 57(1); p. 22-23

Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
Salati, I.; Mykolaichuk, O.
International Experts' Meeting on Decommissioning and Remediation after a Nuclear Accident. Presentations2013
International Experts' Meeting on Decommissioning and Remediation after a Nuclear Accident. Presentations2013
AbstractAbstract
No abstract available
Primary Subject
Source
International Atomic Energy Agency, Division of Radiation, Transport and Waste Safety and Division of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology, Vienna (Austria); vp; 2013; 6 p; International Experts' Meeting on Decommissioning and Remediation after a Nuclear Accident; Vienna (Austria); 28 Jan - 1 Feb 2013; Also available on-line: http://www-pub.iaea.org/iaeameetings/IEM4/1Feb/3a4a.pdf; Published as PowerPoint presentation only
Record Type
Report
Literature Type
Conference
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
Related RecordRelated Record
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
Tebrugge, Kimberly; Disney, Maren
WM Symposia, 1628 E. Southern Avenue, Suite 9-332, Tempe, AZ 85282 (United States)2012
WM Symposia, 1628 E. Southern Avenue, Suite 9-332, Tempe, AZ 85282 (United States)2012
AbstractAbstract
[en] The award of American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funding came with an unprecedented request for transparency to showcase to the American public how the stimulus funding was being put to work to achieve the goals put forth by the U.S. Government. At the U.S. Department of Energy Hanford Site, this request manifested in a contract requirement to provide weekly narrative, photos and video to highlight Recovery Act-funded projects. For DOE contractor CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company (CH2M HILL), the largest recipient of Hanford's funding, the reporting mechanism evolved into a communications tool for documenting the highly technical cleanup, then effectively sharing that story with the DOE and its varying stakeholder audiences. The report set the groundwork for building a streaming narrative of week-by-week progress. With the end of the Recovery Act, CH2M HILL is applying lessons learned from this stringent, transparent reporting process to its long-term reporting and communications of the progress being made in nuclear decommissioning at Hanford. (authors)
Primary Subject
Secondary Subject
Source
2012; 8 p; WM2012: Waste Management 2012 conference on improving the future in waste management; Phoenix, AZ (United States); 26 Feb - 1 Mar 2012; Available online from: http://www.wmsym.org/archives/2012/index.html; Country of input: France; 1 ref.
Record Type
Miscellaneous
Literature Type
Conference
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
AbstractAbstract
[en] New and emerging technologies are making decommissioning and remediation more cost effective, faster and safer. From planning to execution and control, the use of new technologies is on the rise. Before starting decommissioning or environmental remediation, experts need to plan each step of the process, and to do that, they first need a clear idea of the characteristics of the structure and the level of radiation that they can expect to encounter
Original Title
Nuevas tecnologías de clausura y restauración
Primary Subject
Secondary Subject
Source
Also available on-line: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/5712223_es.pdf
Record Type
Journal Article
Journal
IAEA Bulletin (Online); ISSN 1564-2690;
; v. 57(1); p. 22-23

Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
Denman, A.R.; Crockett, R.G.M.; Groves-Kirkby, C.J.; Phillips, P.S., E-mail: Tony.Denman@northampton.ac.uk, E-mail: Robin.Crockett@Northampton.ac.uk, E-mail: Chris.Groves-Kirkby@Northampton.ac.uk, E-mail: Paul.Phillips@Northampton.ac.uk2016
AbstractAbstract
[en] Radon gas is naturally occurring, and can concentrate in the built environment. It is radioactive and high concentration levels within buildings, including homes, have been shown to increase the risk of lung cancer in the occupants. As a result, several methods have been developed to measure radon. The long-term average radon level determines the risk to occupants, but there is always pressure to complete measurements more quickly, particularly when buying and selling the home. For many years, the three-month exposure using etched-track detectors has been the de facto standard, but a decade ago, Phillips et al. (2003), in a DEFRA funded project, evaluated the use of 1-week and 1-month measurements. They found that the measurement methods were accurate, but the challenge lay in the wide variation in radon levels - with diurnal, seasonal, and other patterns due to climatic factors and room use. In the report on this work, and in subsequent papers, the group proposed methodologies for 1-week, 1-month and 3-month measurements and their interpretation. Other work, however, has suggested that 2-week exposures were preferable to 1-week ones. In practice, the radon remediation industry uses a range of exposure times, and further guidance is required to help interpret these results. This paper reviews the data from this study and a subsequent 4-year study of 4 houses, re-analysing the results and extending them to other exposures, particularly for 2-week and 2-month exposures, and provides comprehensive guidance for the use of etched-track detectors, the value and use of Seasonal Correction Factors (SCFs), the uncertainties in short and medium term exposures and the interpretation of results. - Highlights: • A Wide range of exposure times to assess domestic radon from 1-week up were studied. • Short term variability in radon levels makes short term tests less accurate. • Equivocal ranges to interpret results are proposed for each exposure time. • Seasonal correction improves interpretation slightly, but only at long exposures. • Practical protocols for radon testing at a wide range of exposure times are proposed.
Primary Subject
Source
S0265-931X(16)30203-X; Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.06.004; Copyright (c) 2016 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Record Type
Journal Article
Journal
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
AbstractAbstract
[en] New and emerging technologies are making decommissioning and remediation more cost effective, faster and safer. From planning to execution and control, the use of new technologies is on the rise. Before starting decommissioning or environmental remediation, experts need to plan each step of the process, and to do that, they first need a clear idea of the characteristics of the structure and the level of radiation that they can expect to encounter
Primary Subject
Secondary Subject
Source
Also available on-line: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/5712223_ar.pdf
Record Type
Journal Article
Journal
IAEA Bulletin (Online); ISSN 1564-2690;
; v. 57(1); p. 22-23

Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
AbstractAbstract
[en] Standards for remedial actions at hazardous waste sites may be derived from either the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) or the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and their related regulations. At the moment, it may be unclear whether regulators intend to apply one statute or the other, or both, in regard to selecting remedial actions and cleanup criteria for particular sites. It is therefore necessary to describe in general terms the different approaches to determining cleanup standards under the two statutes
Primary Subject
Secondary Subject
Source
Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (USA); p. 61-64; 1987; p. 61-64; Oak Ridge model conference; Oak Ridge, TN (USA); 3-5 Feb 1987; Available from NTIS, PC A19/MF A01; 1 as DE87009018
Record Type
Report
Literature Type
Conference
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
AbstractAbstract
[en] New and emerging technologies are making decommissioning and remediation more cost effective, faster and safer. From planning to execution and control, the use of new technologies is on the rise. Before starting decommissioning or environmental remediation, experts need to plan each step of the process, and to do that, they first need a clear idea of the characteristics of the structure and the level of radiation that they can expect to encounter
Original Title
Nouvelles technologies de déclassement et de remédiation
Primary Subject
Secondary Subject
Source
Also available on-line: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/bull5712223_fr.pdf
Record Type
Journal Article
Journal
IAEA Bulletin (Online); ISSN 1564-2690;
; v. 57(1); p. 22-23

Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
1 | 2 | 3 | Next |