Filters
Results 1 - 10 of 8682
Results 1 - 10 of 8682.
Search took: 0.03 seconds
Sort by: date | relevance |
AbstractAbstract
No abstract available
Primary Subject
Source
Congress on climate change: Global risks, challenges and decisions; Copenhagen (Denmark); 10-12 Mar 2009; Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1307/6/23/232022; Abstract only; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Record Type
Journal Article
Literature Type
Conference
Journal
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (EES); ISSN 1755-1315;
; v. 6(23); [1 p.]

Country of publication
Publication YearPublication Year
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
AbstractAbstract
[en] An alphabetical directory of publications dealing with nuclear fuels and reactors trade lists over 100 references written from the mid-1970s to the present
Original Title
Over 100 references
Primary Subject
Secondary Subject
Source
1983; 9 p; Vance Bibliographies; Monticello, IL (USA); ISBN 0-88066-430-4; 

Record Type
Book
Literature Type
Bibliography
Country of publication
Publication YearPublication Year
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
AbstractAbstract
[en] Recent trends in Australia's energy trade are examined. The Committee concluded that 1980-81 energy export projections, which foreshadowed massive increases in exports of coal, gas and uranium, must now be considered excessively optimistic. Export opportunities are identified and company, union and government policies are discussed
Primary Subject
Source
1984; 41 p; AGPS; Canberra (Australia); ISBN 0 644 03078 X;
; NEAC Report No. 21.

Record Type
Book
Country of publication
Publication YearPublication Year
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
Aviation and the EU Emissions Trading Scheme—Lessons learned from previous emissions trading schemes
Kopsch, Fredrik, E-mail: fredrik.kopsch@abe.kth.se
AbstractAbstract
[en] Designing an emissions trading scheme requires in-depth knowledge regarding several aspects. This paper attempts to clarify some important design points of the forthcoming emissions trading scheme for aviation under the EU ETS. Five general key points of system design are acknowledged and comparisons are made to previous and current emission trading schemes. While it is not meant to be exhaustive it helps to create an understanding of what design elements should be handled with caution. Discussion is provided in regard to the recent implementation of aviation in the EU ETS. Above all, it is argued that initial allocations of emission permits and the trade barrier between the aviation sector and EU ETS need to be carefully examined.
Primary Subject
Source
S0301-4215(12)00604-0; Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.07.023; Copyright (c) 2012 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Record Type
Journal Article
Journal
Country of publication
Publication YearPublication Year
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
AbstractAbstract
[en] Greenhouse gas emission trading in the United States (US) is becoming an increasingly important topic in national politics and trade and industry. There are many developments in legislation and regulation, varying from proposals for a carbon tax in California to discussions in the White House concerning the Lieberman-Warner Bill. Moreover, increasingly more voluntary initiatives and carbon markets are started up. According to a recent study of Point Carbon, the market amounted to 60 billion USD for 2.7 billion tons CO2 in 2007, which is an 80% increase compared to 2006. This article provides an overview of the main developments in the US in this area. [mk]
[nl]
De handel in broeikasgasemissies is in de Verenigde Staten (VS) een steeds belangrijker onderwerp in de nationale politiek en het bedrijfsleven. Op het gebied van wet- en regelgeving is er veel in ontwikkeling: van voorstellen voor een carbon-tax in Californie tot discussies in het Witte Huis rond de Lieberman-Warner Bill. Daarnaast ontstaan er ook steeds meer vrijwillige initiatieven en carbonmarkten. Volgens een recent onderzoek van Point Carbon bedroeg de markt in 2007 USD 60 miljard voor 2,7 miljard ton CO2, een stijging van 80 procent ten opzichte van 2006. Dit artikel geeft een overzicht van de belangrijkste ontwikkelingen in de VS op dit gebiedOriginal Title
De carbonmarkt in de Verenigde Staten
Primary Subject
Source
Extended version of this article available at http://www.twanetwerk.nl/ via Artikelen
Record Type
Journal Article
Journal
TWA Nieuws; ISSN 1572-6045;
; v. 46(3); p. 15

Country of publication
Publication YearPublication Year
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
Feng, Shenghao; Howes, Stephen; Liu, Yu; Zhang, Keyu; Yang, Jun, E-mail: fengshenghao@uibe.edu.cn, E-mail: stephen.howes@anu.edu.au, E-mail: liuyu@casipm.ac.cn, E-mail: yjydy.ccap@igsnrr.ac.cn
AbstractAbstract
[en] Highlights: • Adams and Parmenter's (2013) stylised model is modified to explain simulation results • ETS-linking, even with permit trading, may reduce aggregated welfare. • Pareto-improvement could be attainable in ETS-linking. • More generous caps shall be given to China's less developed regions. - Abstract: China is moving from regional Emissions Trading Schemes (ETSs) to a nation-wide ETS. Although a larger ETS will be more efficient, the literature warns that it could make net permit selling regions worse off. We use a CGE model to simulate the linking of two provincial ETSs, namely those of Hubei and Guangdong. Our simulations suggest a trade-off between efficiency and equity as the richer regions (typified by Guangdong) will benefit from linking but the poorer regions (typified by Hubei) may lose. This is because poorer provinces in China tend to be more emissions intensive and therefore likely to face a carbon price rise upon linking, the costs of which may be only partially offset by trading, if indeed trading is permitted. We show this, and explain why it is the case by improving on the stylized model suggested by Adams and Parmenter (2013). Following Atkinson (1970), we find that worsened equity from linking may dominate improved efficiency, thus reducing aggregated welfare. We advise more generous caps to be given to more emissions intensive and less developed regions. If so, as suggest our simulation results, a Pareto-improvement could be attainable.
Primary Subject
Source
S0140988318300975; Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.03.016; Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Record Type
Journal Article
Journal
Country of publication
Publication YearPublication Year
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
AbstractAbstract
[en] Many studies have shown that the activities of multinational corporations are quite sensitive to differences in income tax rates across countries. In this paper I explore the interaction between multinational taxation and abatement activities under an international emissions permit trading scheme. Four types of plans are considered: (1) a single domestic permit system with international offsets; (2) separate national permit systems without trade; (3) separate national permit systems with limited offsets; and (4) an international permit trading system. For each plan, I model the incentives for the multinational firm to choose abatement activities at home and abroad and to transfer emissions credits between parent and subsidiary. Limits on trading across countries restrict efficiency gains from abatement, as is well known. But if available offset opportunities are limited to actual abatement activities, those activities are also more susceptible to distortions from incentives to shift taxable income. Transfer-pricing rules can limit but not always eliminate these distortions. In a system of unlimited international trading, abatement is efficiently allocated across countries, but tax shifting can still be achieved through intra-firm transfer pricing. From the basis of efficiency for both environmental and tax policies, the best design is an international permit trading system with transparent, enforceable transfer-pricing rules. (author)
Primary Subject
Source
Available from doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2005.08.001; Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
Record Type
Journal Article
Journal
Country of publication
Publication YearPublication Year
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
AbstractAbstract
No abstract available
Original Title
Energia- ja paeaestoekaupan tukijaerjestelmae
Primary Subject
Source
Jussila, J. (ed.) (Technopolis, Oyj, Vantaa (Finland)); Tekes National Technology Agency of Finland, Helsinki (Finland); 246 p; ISBN 978-952-457-374-0;
; 2007; p. 164; Available at http://www.tekes.fi/climbus search path: Julkaisut ja linkit ClimBus-teknologiaohjelman katsaus 2007

Record Type
Report
Report Number
Country of publication
Publication YearPublication Year
Reference NumberReference Number
Related RecordRelated Record
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
AbstractAbstract
[en] Emissions trading is a hot issue. At national as well as supranational levels, proposals for introduction of emissions trading schemes have been made. This paper assesses alternative emissions trading schemes at domestic level: (1) schemes where the total level of emissions is fixed (absolute cap-and-trade), (2) schemes where the allowable level of emissions per firm is related to some firm-specific indicator (relative cap-and-trade), and (3) mixed schemes which combine elements of the above alternatives. We present a quantitative assessment of these alternatives for climate change policy in the Netherlands. It is concluded that while relative cap-and-trade would avoid negative effects on competitiveness, it would not reduce emissions at the lowest costs. Besides, the addition of a trade system to existing relative standards does not result in additional emission reduction; it should be combined with other policy measures, such as energy taxes, in order to realise further reduction. Absolute cap-and-trade leads to efficient emissions reduction, but, implemented at the national level, its overall macroeconomic costs may be significant. The mixed scheme has as drawback that it treats firms unequal, which leads to high administrative costs. We conclude that none of the trading schemes is an advisable instrument for domestic climate policy
Primary Subject
Source
S0301421502003348; Copyright (c) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Record Type
Journal Article
Journal
Country of publication
Publication YearPublication Year
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
AbstractAbstract
No abstract available
Primary Subject
Source
2. international conference on nuclear technology transfer; Buenos Aires (Argentina); 1-5 Nov 1982; CONF-821104--; Published in summary form only.
Record Type
Journal Article
Literature Type
Conference
Journal
Transactions of the American Nuclear Society; ISSN 0003-018X;
; v. 42 p. 159-160

Country of publication
Publication YearPublication Year
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
1 | 2 | 3 | Next |