Namibia's nuclear nightmare
Creators
Description
Since July 1987 Liverpool dock workers refused to handle shipments of Namibian and South African uranium. They are hoping to extend the blockade to other ports in Britain. The recipients of the uranium hexafluoride, British Nuclear Fuels Ltd. (BNFL) have had to find other routes for their shipments of uranium. The main argument for not allowing access to Namibian uranium is to protect Namibia's natural resources, but it is also a stand against aparteid. URENCO, a uranium enrichment consortium with British participation is accused by the United Nations Council for Namibia of processing Namibian uranium at its Dutch plant. Writs have been served but it may be 1989 before the hearings take place. An effective blockade is called for throughout Britain. The routes by which movement of uranium from South Africa takes place is shown schematically. (UK)
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- SCRAM J.
- Journal Issue
- no.63
- Series
- SCRAM J.
- CODEN
- SANJE
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- United Kingdom
- INIS RN
- 19042134
- Subject category
- S11: NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS; S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
- Descriptors DEI
- ENRICHED URANIUM; MINING; PUBLIC OPINION; RESOURCE CONSERVATION; SOUTH AFRICA; UNITED KINGDOM; URANIUM HEXAFLUORIDE; URANIUM ORES
- Descriptors DEC
- ACTINIDE COMPOUNDS; ACTINIDES; AFRICA; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; ELEMENTS; EUROPE; FLUORIDES; FLUORINE COMPOUNDS; HALIDES; HALOGEN COMPOUNDS; ISOTOPE ENRICHED MATERIALS; MATERIALS; METALS; ORES; URANIUM; URANIUM COMPOUNDS; URANIUM FLUORIDES