Filters
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results 1 - 1 of 1.
Search took: 0.02 seconds
Chung, D.H.; Bernreuter, D.L.
California Univ., Livermore (USA). Lawrence Livermore Lab1979
California Univ., Livermore (USA). Lawrence Livermore Lab1979
AbstractAbstract
[en] Attenuation results from geometric spreading and from absorption. The former is almost independent of crustal geology or physiographic region. The latter depends strongly on crustal geology and the state of the earth's upper mantle. Except for very high-frequency waves, absorption does not affect ground motion at distances less than 25 to 50 km. Thus, in the near-field zone, the attenuation in the eastern United States will be similar to that in the western United States. Most of the differences in ground motion can be accounted for by differences in attenuation caused by differences in absorption. The other important factor is that for some Western earthquakes the fault breaks the earth's surface, resulting in larger ground motion. No Eastern earthquakes are known to have broken the earth's surface by faulting. The stress drop of Eastern earthquakes may be higher than for Western earthquakes of the same seismic moment, which would affect the high-frequency spectral content. This factor is believed to be of much less significance than differences in absorption in explaining the differences in ground motion between the East and the West. 6 figures
Primary Subject
Source
13 Apr 1979; 16 p; U.S. National conference on earthquake engineering; Stanford, CA, USA; 22 - 24 Aug 1979; CONF-790831--1; Available from NTIS, PC A02/MF A01
Record Type
Report
Literature Type
Conference; Numerical Data
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue