Filters
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results 1 - 1 of 1.
Search took: 0.015 seconds
Clarke, W.L.; Cowan, R.L; Walker, W.L.
General Electric Co., San Jose, CA (USA). Nuclear Energy Div1977
General Electric Co., San Jose, CA (USA). Nuclear Energy Div1977
AbstractAbstract
[en] Three test methods for determining degree of sensitization in austenitic stainless steels have been investigated. The results clearly show all three test methods are capable of detecting moderate-to-severe degrees of sensitization, but the electrochemical potentiokinetic reactivation technique is the most sensitive for quantitatively determining the levels of sensitization which are of primary concern for industrial use. Both the A262-Practice A and the electrochemical potentiokinetic reactivation methods appear to saturate at high degrees of sensitization, which results in a loss of discriminating power between different heats of material. While the A262-Practice E method does not appear to saturate, and retains its discriminating power at high degrees of sensitization, it is not a suitable method for detection at the lower degrees. Of the three test methods, it appears the electrochemical potentiokinetic reactivation test is the most suitable for determining the quantitative degree of sensitization over the levels of industrial concern
Primary Subject
Source
May 1977; 51 p; General Electric Co., Nuclear Energy Division, San Jose, CA
Record Type
Report
Report Number
Country of publication
ALLOYS, CARBON ADDITIONS, CARBON COMPOUNDS, CHEMICAL REACTIONS, CHROMIUM ALLOYS, CHROMIUM STEELS, CHROMIUM-NICKEL STEELS, CORROSION RESISTANT ALLOYS, CRYSTAL STRUCTURE, FAILURES, HEAT RESISTING ALLOYS, HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS, IRON ALLOYS, IRON BASE ALLOYS, MECHANICAL PROPERTIES, MICROSTRUCTURE, MOLYBDENUM ALLOYS, NICKEL ALLOYS, OXYGEN COMPOUNDS, SEPARATION PROCESSES, SIZE, STAINLESS STEELS, STEELS, TRANSITION ELEMENT ALLOYS
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue