Filters
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results 1 - 1 of 1.
Search took: 0.02 seconds
AbstractAbstract
[en] Dr. Buhl feels that nuclear-energy issues are too complex to be understood as single topics, and can only be understood in relationship to broader issues. In fact, goals and risks associated with all energy options must be seen as interrelated with other broad issues, and it should be understood that there are presently no clearcut criteria to ensure that the best decisions are made. The technical community is responsible for helping the public to understand the basic incompatibility of hard and soft technologies and that there is no risk-free energy source. Four principles are outlined for assessing the risks of various energy technologies: (1) take a holistic view; (2) compare the risk with the unit energy output; (3) compare the risk with those of everyday activities; and (4) identify unusual risks associated with a particular option. Dr. Buhl refers to the study conducted by Dr. Inhaber of Canada who used this approach and concluded that nuclear power and natural gas have the lowest overall risk
Primary Subject
Secondary Subject
Source
Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (USA); p. 5-8; Jul 1979; p. 5-8; 6. annual energy conference and exibition energy and the public; Knoxville, TN, USA; 21 - 23 Feb 1979
Record Type
Report
Literature Type
Conference
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue