Filters
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results 1 - 1 of 1.
Search took: 0.017 seconds
Porter, F.C.; Hernandez, J.J.; Montanet, L.
California Inst. of Tech., Pasadena (USA). Dept. of Physics; European Organization for Nuclear Research, Geneva (Switzerland); Helsinki Univ. (Finland). Dept. of High Energy Physics; Lawrence Berkeley Lab., CA (USA); Junta de Energia Nuclear, Madrid (Spain); Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, CA (USA)1984
California Inst. of Tech., Pasadena (USA). Dept. of Physics; European Organization for Nuclear Research, Geneva (Switzerland); Helsinki Univ. (Finland). Dept. of High Energy Physics; Lawrence Berkeley Lab., CA (USA); Junta de Energia Nuclear, Madrid (Spain); Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, CA (USA)1984
AbstractAbstract
[en] Twenty years ago, the Particle Data Group adopted a systematic naming convention for baryons: the symbols N, Δ, Λ, Σ, Ψ, and Ω were to identify the isospin and strangeness, The mesons, by contrast, have become an alphabet soup of uninformative names - theta, iota, xi, zeta, g/sub T/, g/sub s/, H, E, delta, h, g, r, kappa, etc. -, and in some cases identical names are used for mesons with different quantum numbers (A, B, and D). Furthermore, experimentalists are now discovering baryons that contain heavy quarks. It is therefore timely to consider systematic naming conventions both for mesons and for baryons with heavy quarks. The Particle Data Group is circulating this proposal in the hope of generating feedback, and we attach a sheet for responses. It should be emphasized that the Particle Tables would show both the old and new names for some time
Primary Subject
Source
Oct 1984; 10 p; American Physical Society meeting; Santa Fe, NM (USA); 31 Oct - 3 Nov 1984; CONF-8410222--18; Available from NTIS, PC A02/MF A01 as DE85008453
Record Type
Report
Literature Type
Conference
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue