Filters
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results 1 - 1 of 1.
Search took: 0.02 seconds
Draper, J.V.; Handel, S.J.; Sundstrom, E.; Herndon, J.N.; Fujita, Y.; Maeda, M.
Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (USA); Power Reactor and Nuclear Fuel Development Corp., Tokai, Ibaraki (Japan). Tokai Works1986
Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (USA); Power Reactor and Nuclear Fuel Development Corp., Tokai, Ibaraki (Japan). Tokai Works1986
AbstractAbstract
[en] The Manipulator Comparative Testing Program examined differences among manipulator systems from the United States and Japan. The manipulator systems included the Meidensha BILARM 83A, the Model M-2 of Central Research Laboratories Division of Sargent Industries (CRL), and the GCA Corporation PaR Systems Model 6000. The site of testing was the Remote Operations Maintenance Demonstration (ROMD) facility, operated by the Fuel Recycle Division in the Consolidated Fuel Reprocessing Program at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). In all stages of testing, operators using the CRL Model M-2 manipulator had consistently lower times to completion and error rates than they did using other machines. Performance was second best with the Meidensha BILARM 83A in master-slave mode. Performance with the BILARM in switchbox mode and the PaR 6000 manipulator was approximately equivalent in terms of criteria recorded in testing. These data show no impact of force reflection on task performance
Primary Subject
Secondary Subject
Source
1986; 12 p; American Nuclear Society and Atomic Industrial Forum joint meeting; Washington, DC (USA); 16-21 Nov 1986; Available from NTIS, PC A02/MF A01; 1 as DE87000358; Portions of this document are illegible in microfiche products.
Record Type
Report
Literature Type
Conference
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue