Filters
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results 1 - 1 of 1.
Search took: 0.019 seconds
Miller, C.W.; Fields, D.E.; Cotter, S.J.
Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (USA)1986
Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (USA)1986
AbstractAbstract
[en] The accuracy of an environmental transport model is best determined by comparing model predictions with environmental measurements made under conditions similar to those assumed by the model, a process commonly referred to as model validation. Over the past several years, we have done a variety of validation studies with the popular Gaussian plume atmospheric dispersion model using data from tests conducted on the Hanford reservation. Data for short-term releases of small particles for release heights of 2 m, 56 m, and 111 m have been used. Up to six different sets of atmospheric dispersion parameters and three different atmospheric stability class specification schemes have been examined. Overall, dispersion parameters based on measurements made near Juelich, West Germany, give the best comparisons between observed and predicted air concentrations. The commonly-used vertical temperature gradient method for determining atmospheric stability class consistently gives poor results. The accuracy of air concentration predictions improves when dry deposition processes are included in the model. Further validation studies using various Hanford data sets are planned
Primary Subject
Source
Oct 1986; 22 p; Hanford Life Sciences symposium: radiation protection-a look to the future - celebrating four decades of research at Hanford; Richland, WA (USA); 21-23 Oct 1986; Available from NTIS, PC A02/MF A01; 1 as DE87002416; Portions of this document are illegible in microfiche products.
Record Type
Report
Literature Type
Conference
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue