Filters
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results 1 - 1 of 1.
Search took: 0.014 seconds
Morgenstern, V.M.; Upadhyaya, B.R.; Gloeckler, O.
Tennessee Univ., Knoxville (USA). Dept. of Nuclear Engineering1988
Tennessee Univ., Knoxville (USA). Dept. of Nuclear Engineering1988
AbstractAbstract
[en] As part of a comprehensive signal validation system, we have developed a signal anomaly detector, without specifically establishing the cause of the anomaly. A signal recorded from process instrumentation is said to have an anomaly, if during steady-state operation, the deviation in the level of the signal, its root-mean-square (RMS) value, or its statistical distribution changes by a preset value. This deviation could be an unacceptable increase or a decrease in the quantity being monitored. An anomaly in a signal may be characterized by wideband or single-frequency noise, bias error, pulse-type error, nonsymmetric behavior, or a change in the signal bandwidth. Various signatures can be easily computed from data samples and compared against specified threshold values. We want to point out that in real processes, pulses can appear with different time widths, and at different rates of change of the signal. Thus, in characterizing an anomaly as a pulse-type, the fastest pulse width is constrained by the signal sampling interval. For example, if a signal is sampled at 100 Hz, we will not be able to detect pulses occurring at kHz rates. Discussion with utility and Combustion Engineering personnel indicated that it is not practical to detect pulses having a narrow time width. 9 refs., 11 figs., 8 tabs
Source
Aug 1988; 72 p; Available from NTIS, PC A04/MF A01; 1 as DE88015701; Portions of this document are illegible in microfiche products.
Record Type
Report
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue