Filters
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results 1 - 1 of 1.
Search took: 0.016 seconds
Swinth, K.L.; Hickey, E.E.
Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (USA)1988
Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (USA)1988
AbstractAbstract
[en] The response of radiation measuring instruments will vary due to the temperature sensitivity of circuit components and detectors. Tests on approximately 60 dose rate instruments showed significant changes in response to temperature variation (/minus/20 to +50/degree/C). Comparing instrument response at a constant 20/degree/C with responses over the experimental range of temperatures revealed that dose rate responses of some instruments changed over 100%. In tests on a series of instruments of the same model, the change in response varied from instrument to instrument, making it impractical to predict instrument response without tests on the specific instrument. Scintillation detectors, ion chambers, and proportional counters are more sensitive to temperature than are Geiger-Mueller detectors, but stabilization circuits can adequately compensate for the sensitivity of scintillation detectors. Response curves are presented for several instruments over the temperature range of /minus/20 to +50/degree/C. 2 refs., 5 figs., 2 tabs
Source
Sep 1988; 10 p; 22. health physics midyear topical meeting on instrumentation; San Antonio, TX (USA); 4-8 Dec 1988; CONF-881232--12; Available from NTIS, PC A02/MF A01 - OSTI; 1 as DE89005159; Portions of this document are illegible in microfiche products.
Record Type
Report
Literature Type
Conference; Numerical Data
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue