Filters
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results 1 - 1 of 1.
Search took: 0.015 seconds
Fleischmann, H.H.; Zweben, S.J.; Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY
Princeton Univ., NJ (United States). Plasma Physics Lab.; Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY (United States). School of Applied and Engineering Physics. Funding organisation: USDOE, Washington, DC (United States)1993
Princeton Univ., NJ (United States). Plasma Physics Lab.; Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY (United States). School of Applied and Engineering Physics. Funding organisation: USDOE, Washington, DC (United States)1993
AbstractAbstract
[en] A detailed evaluation of various potential mechanisms for the generation of strong runaway beams during disruptions of largetokamak devices, including TFTR, JET, DIIID and ITER, is performed based on typical operating parameters of these devices and the presently accepted disruption model. The main results include: (1) In the existing devices, the evaporative ''preicer'' process by itself can lead to sizable runaway beams in disruptions of high-current-medium-to-low-ne discharges. In ITER, such runaways are expected mainly for discharges with ne values sizably smaller than the projected typical ones. (2) Runaway generation also may occur during post-thermal-quench period through the untrapping of trapped hot-thermal electrons remaining from the pre-thermal-quench plasma; this process may be directly important in particular in disruptions of high-Te discharges with details depending on the time required for reclosure of the magnetic surfaces. Both processes (1) and (2) will occur and be completed mostly during the initial few 100 μsec after the thermal quench. (3) Subsequently, close collisions of runaways with cold plasma electrons generally will lead to an exponential growth (''avalanching'') of runaway populations generated by processes (1) and/or (2) and/or others; this process will be effective in particular during the current quench phase and will continue until the resulting runaway beam will carry essentially all of the remaining discharge current. In presently existing devices, possible avalanche factors of up to 102--105 may be expected; in ITER, avalanche factors of up to 1010--1015 -- if not properly suppressed -- are expected to lead to strong runaway beams in most disruptions, except those at particularly high densities. At the same time, avalanching will shift the main part of their energy spectrum down to relatively low energies around 10--20 MeV, and may sizably change the spatial distribution of the runaways
Primary Subject
Source
Jun 1993; 50 p; CONTRACT AC02-76CH03073; FG02-92ER54183; OSTI as DE93016724; NTIS; INIS; US Govt. Printing Office Dep.
Record Type
Report
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue