Filters
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results 1 - 1 of 1.
Search took: 0.017 seconds
McHenry, R.S.; Moore, T.J.; Maurer, J.H.; Todreas, N.E.
Idaho National Engineering Lab., Idaho Falls, ID (United States). Funding organisation: USDOE, Washington, DC (United States)1997
Idaho National Engineering Lab., Idaho Falls, ID (United States). Funding organisation: USDOE, Washington, DC (United States)1997
AbstractAbstract
[en] The impetus for improved economic performance of commercial nuclear power plants can be partially satisfied by increasing plant capacity factors through operating cycle extension. One aspect of an operating cycle extension effort is the modification of plant surveillance programs to complete required regulatory and investment protection surveillance activities within the extended planned outage schedule. The goal of this paper is to introduce a general strategy for existing power plants to transition their surveillance programs to an extended operating cycle up to 48 months in length, and to test the feasibility of this strategy through the complete analysis of the surveillance programs at operating BWR and PWR case study plants. The reconciliation of surveillances at these plants demonstrates that surveillance performance will not preclude 48 month operating cycles. Those surveillance activities that could not be resolved to an extended cycle are identified for further study. Finally, a number of general issues are presented that should be considered before implementing a cycle extension effort
Primary Subject
Source
1997; 8 p; 5. international topical meeting on nuclear thermal hydraulics, operations, and safety and exhibition; Beijing (China); 14-18 Apr 1997; CONF-970437--3; CONTRACT AC07-94ID13223; Also available from OSTI as DE97052133; NTIS; US Govt. Printing Office Dep
Record Type
Report
Literature Type
Conference
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue