Filters
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results 1 - 1 of 1.
Search took: 0.017 seconds
Foster, B.D.; Musick, R.G.; Pedalino, J.P.; Cowley, J.L.; Karney, C.C.; Kremer, J.L.
Bechtel Nevada Inc., Las Vegas, NV (United States). Funding organisation: USDOE Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management, Washington, DC (United States)1998
Bechtel Nevada Inc., Las Vegas, NV (United States). Funding organisation: USDOE Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management, Washington, DC (United States)1998
AbstractAbstract
[en] This paper describes design and construction, project management, and testing results associated with the Waste Examination Facility (WEF) recently constructed at the Nevada Test Site (NTS). The WEF and associated systems were designed, procured, and constructed on an extremely tight budget and within a fast track schedule. Part 1 of this paper focuses on design and construction activities, Part 2 discusses project management of WEF design and construction activities, and Part 3 describes the results of the transuranic (TRU) waste examination pilot project conducted at the WEF. In Part 1, the waste examination process is described within the context of Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) characterization requirements. Design criteria are described from operational and radiological protection considerations. The WEF engineered systems are described. These systems include isolation barriers using a glove box and secondary containment structure, high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration and ventilation systems, differential pressure monitoring systems, and fire protection systems. In Part 2, the project management techniques used for ensuring that stringent cost/schedule requirements were met are described. The critical attributes of these management systems are described with an emphasis on team work. In Part 3, the results of a pilot project directed at performing intrusive characterization (i.e., examination) of TRU waste at the WEF are described. Project activities included cold and hot operations. Cold operations included operator training, facility systems walk down, and operational procedures validation. Hot operations included working with plutonium contaminated TRU waste and consisted of waste container breaching, waste examination, waste segregation, data collection, and waste repackaging
Primary Subject
Source
Jan 1998; 16 p; Waste management '98; Tucson, AZ (United States); 1-5 Mar 1998; CONF-980307--; CONTRACT AC08-96NV11718; ALSO AVAILABLE FROM OSTI AS DE98052961; NTIS; US GOVT. PRINTING OFFICE DEP
Record Type
Report
Literature Type
Conference
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue