[en] A standardised pancake labelled with 20 MBq of ¹¹¹In Amberlite-resin was used to study colonic transit in spinal-cord-injured subjects. Four methods of presenting the data were assessed in order to determine the best method of presentation for clinical practice. Method: Sixteen subjects (8 tetraplegics, 8 paraplegics), who had sustained traumatic spinal injury at least 12 months prior to the investigation, were studied. Each subject was given a radiolabelled pancake to eat on a Monday, following an overnight fast. Initial anterior and posterior images were acquired at 3-4 hours post ingestion of the pancake and thereafter 3 times daily for a total of 5 days. The colon was divided into 6 regions of interest (ROI) and the counts in each region, for each time point were noted. The counts in each ROI were used to calculate the geometric centre of colonic activity for each time point. The geometric mean (GM) was also calculated from these counts. The percentage activity in each ROI was calculated using the GM. The percentage activity in each ROI was used to construct parametric images, and time-activity curves comparing transit through the right colon with that of the left colon. Visual assessment was made of the analogue images. The agreement between the various methods of analysing the data, for each subject, was compared. Results: There was no complete agreement between the four methods of assessment. The best agreement occurred between the parametric images and the arrival and clearance of activity in the right and left sides of the colon. Conclusion: Visual assessment is subjective. At least two quantitative methods of analysing the data should be used to assess colonic transit