[en] AIM: To evaluate the halo sign for accurately distinguishing benign from malignant colonic wall thickening. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) examinations of 92 patients (70 men; 22 women; mean age 57 years) with pathologically proven colonic wall thickening (51 benign and 41 malignant) were retrospectively reviewed in a blinded fashion. The affected segment was assessed for presence of the halo sign, degree and uniformity of thickness and density of the intramural stratum. RESULTS: The halo sign was present in 74.5% (38/51) patients with benign and 7.3% (3/41) patients with malignant bowel disease. The presence of the halo sign was 75.4% sensitive and 92.5% specific for benign bowel wall thickening. All 38 benign halos showed uniform, continuous stratification; only one of three malignant halos met the strict criteria for benign halo. CONCLUSION: The halo sign is a moderately sensitive and highly specific sign for distinguishing benign from malignant bowel wall thickening. However, it is not pathognomonic for benign disease. Detailed analysis of halo characteristics is necessary to improve the usefulness of this finding