Filters
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results 1 - 1 of 1.
Search took: 0.015 seconds
Bird, G.A.; Thompson, P.A.; Macdonald, C.R.; Sheppard, S.C.
Protection of the environment from ionising radiation. The development and application of a system of radiation protection for the environment. Proceedings of the third international symposium on the protection of the environment from ionising radiation (SPEIR 3). Unedited papers2003
Protection of the environment from ionising radiation. The development and application of a system of radiation protection for the environment. Proceedings of the third international symposium on the protection of the environment from ionising radiation (SPEIR 3). Unedited papers2003
AbstractAbstract
[en] The radiological impact of radionuclides released from nuclear facilities is being assessed for regulatory purposes using an ecological assessment framework. Hazard quotients are determined by dividing an estimated exposure value (EEV) by an estimated no effect value (ENEV). Values less than one indicate that environmental harm is not likely, whereas in Tier 2 or Tier 3 assessments values greater than one indicate the potential for environmental harm. Radiation exposure values are calculated using annual mean radionuclide concentrations in water, sediment and biota, and either published screening DCFs or dosimetry equations taking into account the geometry and size of the organism. A relative biological effectiveness (RBE) weighting factor of 40 for alpha emitters and 3 for tritium is used in the dose calculations. When radionuclide concentrations are not measured in biota, they are estimated from published geometric mean concentration ratios. Radionuclide concentrations in benthic invertebrates are assumed to be equivalent to those in the sediment. The radiation dose is the sum of the internal and external doses, except for benthic invertebrates where the total radiation dose is assumed to be from internal radiation exposure. The ENEVs for the various taxonomic groups are determined from literature data using an ecotoxicological approach. The ENEVs derived for radiation effects on biota are: 0.2 Gy·a-1 for fish, 2 G a-1 for both benthic invertebrates and terrestrial invertebrates, and 1 Gy·a-1 for algae, macrophytes, mammals and terrestrial plants. The assessment conducted for uranium mines and mills is presented as a case study outlining the recommended approach. The results suggest that a probabilistic Tier 3 assessment may not be necessary when environmental data are readily available. (author)
Primary Subject
Source
Supervising Scientist Division, Environment Australia, Darwin, NT (Australia); Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency, Yallambie, VIC (Australia); International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (Austria); 443 p; ISBN 92-0-103603-5;
; May 2003; p. 241-247; 3. international symposium on the protection of the environment from ionising radiation (SPEIR 3); Darwin (Australia); 22-26 Jul 2002; ISSN 1563-0153;
; Also available on-line: http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/CSP-17_web.pdf and on 1 CD-ROM as IAEA-CSP-17/CD from IAEA, Sales and Promotion Unit: E-mail: sales.publications@iaea.org; Web site: http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/publications.asp; 19 refs, 3 tabs


Record Type
Report
Literature Type
Conference
Report Number
Country of publication
BETA DECAY RADIOISOTOPES, BETA-MINUS DECAY RADIOISOTOPES, CHARGED PARTICLES, DEVELOPED COUNTRIES, DOCUMENT TYPES, ECOLOGY, HYDROGEN ISOTOPES, IONIZING RADIATIONS, ISOTOPES, LIGHT NUCLEI, MANAGEMENT, MATERIALS, NORTH AMERICA, NUCLEI, ODD-EVEN NUCLEI, RADIATIONS, RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS, RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT, RADIOACTIVE WASTES, RADIOISOTOPES, WASTE DISPOSAL, WASTE MANAGEMENT, WASTES, YEARS LIVING RADIOISOTOPES
Reference NumberReference Number
Related RecordRelated Record
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue