Filters
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results 1 - 1 of 1.
Search took: 0.017 seconds
Sundberg, Jan; Kukkonen, Ilmo; Haelldahl, Lars
Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co., Stockholm (Sweden)2003
Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co., Stockholm (Sweden)2003
AbstractAbstract
[en] A strategy for a thermal site descriptive model of bedrock is under development at SKB. In the model different kinds of uncertainties exist. Some of these uncertainties are related to the potential errors in the methods used for determining thermal properties of rock. In two earlier investigations thermal properties of rock samples were analysed according to the TPS method (transient plane source). Thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity were determined using the TPS method. For a comparison, the same samples have been measured at the Geological Survey of Finland (GSF), using different laboratory methods. In this later investigation, the thermal conductivity was determined using the divided-bar method and the specific heat capacity using a calorimetric method. The mean differences between the results of different methods are relatively low but the results of individual samples show large variations. The thermal conductivity measured by the divided bar method gives for most samples slightly higher values, in average about 3%, than the TPS method. The specific heat capacity measured by the calorimetric method gives lower values, in average about 2%, than the TPS method. Consequently, the thermal diffusivity calculated from thermal conductivity and specific heat capacity gives higher values, in average about 6%, than the TPS method. Reasons for the differences are estimated mainly to be dependent on differences between the samples, errors in the temperature dependence of specific heat and in the transformation from volumetric to specific heat. The TPS measurements are performed using two pieces (sub-samples) of rock. Only one of these two sub-samples was measured using the divided bar method and the calorimetric method. Further, sample preparation involved changes in the size of some of the samples. The mean differences between the results of different methods are within the margins of error reported by the measuring laboratories. However, systematic errors in one or both methods cannot be excluded. For future investigations a set of thermal conductivity standard materials should be selected for testing using the different methods of the laboratories. The material should have thermal properties in the range of typical rocks, be fine-grained and suitable for making samples of different shapes and volumes adjusted to different measurement techniques. Because of large obtained individual variations in the results, comparisons of different methods should continue and include measurements of temperature dependence of thermal properties, especially the specific heat. This should cover the relevant temperature range of about 0-90 deg C. Further comparisons would add to previous studies of temperature dependence of the present rocks
Primary Subject
Source
Apr 2003; 29 p; ISSN 1402-3091;
; Also available from: http://www.skb.se/upload/publications/pdf/R-03-18webb.pdf; 11 refs., 4 figs., 8 tabs

Record Type
Report
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue