Filters
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results 1 - 1 of 1.
Search took: 0.016 seconds
AbstractAbstract
[en] Since many of the adverse events that have occurred in nuclear power plants in Japan and abroad have been related to maintenance or operation, it is necessary to plan preventive measures based on detailed analyses of human errors made by maintenance workers or operators. Therefore, before planning preventive measures, we developed a new method of analyzing human errors. Since each human error is an unsafe action caused by some misjudgement made by a person, we decided to classify them into six categories according to the stage in the judgment process in which the error was made. By further classifying each error into either an omission-type or commission-type, we produced 12 categories of errors. Then, we divided them into the two categories of basic error tendencies and individual error tendencies, and categorized background factors into four categories: imperfect planning; imperfect facilities or tools; imperfect environment; and imperfect instructions or communication. We thus defined the factors in each category to make it easy to identify factors that caused the error. Then using this method, we studied the characteristics of human errors that involved maintenance workers and planners since many maintenance errors have occurred. Among the human errors made by workers (worker errors) during the implementation stage, the following three types were prevalent with approximately 80%: commission-type 'projection errors', omission-type comprehension errors' and commission type 'action errors'. The most common among the individual factors of worker errors was 'repetition or habit' (schema), based on the assumption of a typical situation, and the half number of the 'repetition or habit' cases (schema) were not influenced by any background factors. The most common background factor that contributed to the individual factor was 'imperfect work environment', followed by 'insufficient knowledge'. Approximately 80% of the individual factors were 'repetition or habit' or 'insufficient knowledge'. Also, among the human errors made by planners (planner errors), a commission-type 'projection error' was prevalent with approximately 60%. Among planner errors, heuristic thinking was prevalent with approximately 60%, in which the person believed that a certain degree of imperfection in executing some mechanical processes was permitted as experiential practice, and we found that background factors hardly contributed to any individual factors of planner errors. (author)
Primary Subject
Source
22 refs., 20 figs., 7 tabs.
Record Type
Journal Article
Journal
INSS Journal; ISSN 1340-4482;
; v. 14; p. 293-309

Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue