[en] We aimed to compare the efficiency of prostate cancer (PCa) detection using a radiomics signature based on advanced zoomed diffusion-weighted imaging and conventional full-field-of-view DWI. A total of 136 patients, including 73 patients with PCa and 63 without PCa, underwent multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI). Radiomic features were extracted from prostate lesion areas segmented on full-field-of-view DWI with b-value = 1500 s/mm${}^2$ (f-DWI${}_{b1500}$), advanced zoomed DWI images with b-value = 1500 s/mm${}^2$ (z-DWI${}_{b1500}$), calculated zoomed DWI with b-value = 2000 s/mm${}^2$ (z-calDWI${}_{b2000}$), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps derived from both sequences (f-ADC and z-ADC). Single-imaging modality radiomics signature, mp-MRI radiomics signature, and a mixed model based on mp-MRI and clinically independent risk factors were built to predict PCa probability. The diagnostic efficacy and the potential net benefits of each model were evaluated. Both z-DWI${}_{b1500}$ and z-calDWI${}_{b2000}$ had significantly better predictive performance than f-DWI${}_{b1500}$ (z-DWI${}_{b1500}$ vs. f-DWI${}_{b1500}$: p = 0.048; z-calDWI${}_{b2000}$ vs. f-DWI${}_{b1500}$: p = 0.014). z-ADC had a slightly higher area under the curve (AUC) value compared with f-ADC value but was not significantly different (p = 0.127). For predicting the presence of PCa, the AUCs of clinical independent risk factors model, mp-MRI model, and mixed model were 0.81, 0.93, and 0.94 in training sets, and 0.74, 0.92, and 0.93 in validation sets, respectively. Radiomics signatures based on the z-DWI technology had better diagnostic accuracy for PCa than that based on the f-DWI technology. The mixed model was better at diagnosing PCa and guiding clinical interventions for patients with suspected PCa compared with mp-MRI signatures and clinically independent risk factors.