[en] In the author's opinion, the discussion between experts and laymen, i.e. between technicians and scientists, on the one hand, and citizens or scientists who have become critical, on the other, is becoming so difficult 'because of the general uncertainty and fear of the atomic age determine attitudes and approaches'. According to the author, the consequence for future discussions on safety should be better utilization of the possibilities existing on the different levels. It is a matter of 'rendering the progress of the highly technical discourse based on experience, intelligible to everyone.' According to the author, everyone who takes part in the public discussion should make his own particular contribution. The expert should give his knowledge, the politician should expound the criteria for his decision, the citizen should make state of his reservations and worries. Only when people measure themselves against each other and when questions are really answered, will the way be paved for meaningful nuclear power politics. It must not become a blind ramblings in a dangerous future.' (orig./HP)