Published March 8, 2011 | Version v1
Report

Using a Systematic Approach to Identifying Organizational Factors in Root Cause Analysis

  • 1. The 42 Group, LLC (United States)

Description

This presentation set the scene for the second discussion session. In her presentation, the author observed that: - Investigators do not see the connection between the analysis tools available and the identification of HOF. Most investigators use the tools in a cursory manner and so do not derive the full benefits of the tools. Some tools are used for presentation purposes as opposed to being used for analytical purposes e.g. event and causal factors charts. In some cases, the report will indicate that specific analytical tools were used in the investigation but the analysis is not in the body of the report. - Some investigators are documenting HOF causes but do not recognize them as such. This indicates a lack of understanding of HOF. - Others investigators focus on technical issues because of their own comfort level. - The culture of the Organisation will affect the depth of the investigation and therefore the use of the analytical tools to pursue HOF issues. - The author contends that if analysis tools are applied systematically to gather factually based data, then HOF issues can be identified. The use of factual information (without judgement and subjectivity) is important to maintain the credibility of the investigation especially when HOF issues are identified. - Systematic use of tools assists in better communication of the issues to foster greater understanding and acceptance by senior management. - Barrier Analysis, Change Analysis, and TWIN (Task Demands, Work Environment, Individual Capabilities, and Human Nature) all offer the opportunity to identify HOF issues if the analyst pursues this line of investigation. It was illustrated that many elements of the TWIN Error Precursors are themselves Organisational in nature. - The TWIN model applied to the Anatomy of an Event will help to distinguish those which are Organisational issues (Latent Organisational Weaknesses, Error Precursors and Flawed Defences) and those which are human factors (Active Errors). - Barriers to the identification of HOF in an event investigation may lie with the individual analyst or within the organisation

Part of:
Identifying and Overcoming Barriers to Effective Consideration of Human and Organisational Factors in Event Analysis and Root Cause Analysis. Workshop Proceedings, September 21-22, 2009, Paris, France

Additional details

Publishing Information

Imprint Title
Identifying and Overcoming Barriers to Effective Consideration of Human and Organisational Factors in Event Analysis and Root Cause Analysis. Workshop Proceedings, September 21-22, 2009, Paris, France
Imprint Pagination
195 p.
Journal Page Range
p. 117-146
Report number
NEA-CSNI-R--2010-8

Conference

Title
Workshop on Identifying and Overcoming Barriers to Effective Consideration of Human and Organisational Factors in Event Analysis and Root Cause Analysis
Dates
21-22 Sep 2009
Place
Paris (France)

INIS

Country of Publication
Nuclear Energy Agency of the OECD (NEA)
Country of Input or Organization
Nuclear Energy Agency of the OECD (NEA)
INIS RN
48058422
Subject category
S99: GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Conference
Descriptors DEI
BEHAVIOR; ERRORS; FAILURE MODE ANALYSIS; HUMAN FACTORS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; ORGANIZATIONAL MODELS; PERFORMANCE; RELIABILITY; REMEDIAL ACTION; TRAINING
Descriptors DEC
EDUCATION; SYSTEM FAILURE ANALYSIS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS

Optional Information